Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

nankai-business-review

Use when targeting 《南开管理评论》(Nankai Business Review) — a top Chinese business-school journal for strategy, organizational behavior, HRM, marketing, and corporate governance. Apply when a paper builds management theory grounded in the China context, uses survey/SEM or multi-case methods, and needs theoretical contribution framed for an OB/strategy audience rather than econometric policy evaluation.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nankai-business-review --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Chinese-SocialScience-Journal-Skills/skills/nankai-business-review/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 《南开管理评论》投稿(nankai-business-review) ## 期刊定位 国内**商学/组织管理**顶刊。学科底色是**管理学理论建构**:战略管理、组织行为、人力资源、市场营销、公司治理、创业。与《管理世界》相比更"学院派管理学",与《管理科学学报》相比更"行为/理论"而非"数理优化"。核心评判:**理论贡献 + 中国情境 + 方法规范(问卷实证 / 多案例)。** ## 触发时机 - 题目是组织/战略/营销/治理的**构念间关系**(中介、调节、被调节的中介) - 数据是**问卷/量表**(个体或企业层级),方法是 SEM / 多层线性模型 / 实验 - 或是**多案例 / 扎根理论**的质性建构 - 想判断该投《南开管理评论》《管理世界》还是《管理科学学报》 ## 选题偏好 1. **组织行为与人力资源**:领导、团队、员工态度行为、HR 实践 2. **战略与创业**:战略选择、动态能力、商业模式、创业过程 3. **市场营销**:消费者行为、品牌、渠道、数字营销 4. **公司治理**:董事会、股权、高管激励(偏管理学视角而非纯财务) ## 方法与规范 - **问卷实证**:量表需有信度(Cronbach's α、CR)、效度(收敛/区分效度、AVE)、共同方法偏差检验(Harman/标记变量) - 模型多为**中介/调节/被调节的中介**(Bootstrap 检验间接效应);多层数据用 HLM - 实验法日益受欢迎:操纵检验、随机化、效应量 - **质性研究**:多案例比较、扎根理论编码(开放-主轴-选择),讲清理论饱和与可信度 - 重点不是因果识别的"干净",而是**构念清晰 + 理论逻辑 + 测量规范** ## 结构与写作 - 引言立**理论缺口**:现有理论解释不了什么,本文补什么命题 - 假设推演:每条假设有理论机理支撑(而非"我觉得正相关") - 讨论部分要回扣理论贡献(对哪个理论的扩展/边界条件/整合) - 中国情境是加分项:情境如何改变构念关系,提炼情境化理论 ## 路由防误投 - 本刊快速定位属于“管理科学与工商管理”通道;只有当稿件的核心贡献满足“组织、战略、创新管理、管理科学模型、系统工程或企业管理机制必须是核心贡献”时,才把 《南开管理评论》 作为首选。 - 相近 profile 先比较:`modern-finance-and-economics`(《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》) / `modern-financial-research`(《现代金融研究》) / `nankai-economic-studies`(《南开经济研究》) / `organization-and-management`(《组织与管理》)。若这些刊物的读者对象更贴近,不要因为名称、地区或变量相似而强行投本刊。 - 常见误投:若只是

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 期刊定位
  2. 触发时机
  3. 选题偏好
  4. 方法与规范
  5. 结构与写作
  6. 路由防误投
  7. 官方核验清单
  8. 投稿前自检
  9. 高频拒稿雷区
  10. 决策口诀
  11. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the nankai-business-review skill do?

Use when targeting 《南开管理评论》(Nankai Business Review) — a top Chinese business-school journal for strategy, organizational behavior, HRM, marketing, and corporate governance. Apply when a paper builds management theory grounded in the China context, uses survey/SEM or multi-case methods, and needs theoretical contribution framed for an OB/strategy audience rather than econometric policy evaluation.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill nankai-business-review --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going