Agent skill · Content & Marketing

mksc-topic-selection

Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Marketing Science manuscript — testing whether a marketing problem is important AND admits a formal model (structural or analytical), and whether Marketing Science (not JCR/JMR/Management Science) is the right venue.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/mksc-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection & Venue Fit (mksc-topic-selection) ## When to trigger - You have a marketing phenomenon (pricing, advertising/digital, branding, channels/retail, platforms, analytics) but no modeling angle - You are unsure whether the question is "important" by Marketing Science standards - You have a finding but it is a reduced-form correlation with no model - You cannot decide between Marketing Science, JCR, JMR, or Management Science ## The two-part fit test Marketing Science publishes "articles that answer **important research questions in marketing using mathematical modeling**." A topic must pass both gates: 1. **Substantive importance.** A real marketing decision or market phenomenon — how firms price, advertise, design assortments, or how consumers and markets respond — that managers or the field care about. 2. **Modelability.** It can be framed as an analytical (game-theoretic) model of strategic interaction, OR a structural econometric model of demand/supply that is estimable and yields counterfactuals. If neither fits, MKSC is likely the wrong venue. A strong MKSC topic usually implies a **counterfactual or policy question** — "what happens to prices, share, or welfare

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The two-part fit test
  3. Pick the genre the question implies
  4. Venue contrast
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Fit pass for Marketing Science
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the mksc-topic-selection skill do?

Use when choosing or sharpening the research question for a Marketing Science manuscript — testing whether a marketing problem is important AND admits a formal model (structural or analytical), and whether Marketing Science (not JCR/JMR/Management Science) is the right venue.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going