Agent skill · Data & Analytics

mksc-methods

Use when the empirical/analytical approach is the bottleneck for a Marketing Science manuscript — choosing among structural econometrics, analytical modeling, and model-disciplined causal/ML methods, and making the model estimable and identified. Designs the approach; it does not execute the estimation and counterfactuals (mksc-data-analysis).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Marketing-Science-Skills/skills/mksc-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Methods & Identification (mksc-methods) ## When to trigger - You must choose between a structural, analytical, or reduced-form/causal-ML approach - The model is written but not yet estimable (parameters, moments, normalization) - Identification is hand-waved ("we use instruments") without specifics - A reviewer says "the design cannot identify the structural parameters" ## Choose the genre that fits the claim Marketing Science is methodologically plural around a modeling core: structural econometrics, analytical models, econometric/statistical analysis, ML tools, surveys, and experiments — all judged by whether they develop, test, or rigorously apply a formal model. | Claim / goal | Approach that earns it | |------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------| | Quantify demand and simulate a policy | Structural demand (BLP/mixed logit), supply FOCs, counterfactual | | Forward-looking behavior, adoption, churn | Dynamic discrete choice / dynamic games (Rust, BBL, CCP) | | Strategic-interaction insight, comparative statics | Analytical (game-theoretic) model | | Bidding, sponsored search, marketplaces | Auction/struc

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Choose the genre that fits the claim
  3. Make the model estimable and identified
  4. For analytical papers
  5. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Methods pass for Marketing Science
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the mksc-methods skill do?

Use when the empirical/analytical approach is the bottleneck for a Marketing Science manuscript — choosing among structural econometrics, analytical modeling, and model-disciplined causal/ML methods, and making the model estimable and identified. Designs the approach; it does not execute the estimation and counterfactuals (mksc-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill mksc-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going