Agent skill · Data & Analytics

misq-theory-development

Use when building the theoretical engine of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — a behavioral mechanism and hypotheses, a design theory and testable design propositions for a design-science artifact, an economic mechanism for an economics-of-IS study, or an organizational process theory. Adapts the form of "theory" to the paper's IS tradition; does not run the analysis (misq-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill misq-theory-development --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: MIS-Quarterly-Skills/skills/misq-theory-development/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Theory Development (misq-theory-development) ## When to trigger - Your claims are descriptive ("A is associated with B") with no IS mechanism - You built an IT artifact but cannot say what *design knowledge* it embodies - A Senior Editor or reviewer says "the theoretical contribution is unclear" or "this is a technical exercise" - You need hypotheses or design propositions derived *before* you look at results ## Theory takes a different shape in each MISQ tradition MISQ is pluralistic, so "develop theory" means different things. Pick the row that matches your tradition. | Tradition | What "theory" means here | What you must produce | |-----------|--------------------------|------------------------| | **Behavioral** | A causal mechanism linking IT to cognition, behavior, or outcomes | A priori hypotheses with an explicit mechanism, boundary conditions, and any mediation/moderation logic | | **Design science** | A *design theory*: the principles that make the artifact work | Justificatory (kernel) theory, design principles/requirements, and testable propositions about the artifact's utility | | **Economics of IS** | An economic mechanism (incentives, information, matching, network

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Theory takes a different shape in each MISQ tradition
  3. Behavioral and economics: derive claims a priori
  4. Design science: ground the artifact in a design theory
  5. Make boundary conditions explicit
  6. Before/after: from correlation to IS mechanism
  7. Design-science worked chain (kernel → principle → proposition)
  8. Checklist
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the misq-theory-development skill do?

Use when building the theoretical engine of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — a behavioral mechanism and hypotheses, a design theory and testable design propositions for a design-science artifact, an economic mechanism for an economics-of-IS study, or an organizational process theory. Adapts the form of "theory" to the paper's IS tradition; does not run the analysis (misq-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill misq-theory-development --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going