Agent skill · Data & Analytics

misq-data-analysis

Use when running and reporting the empirical core of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — measurement and structural models (PLS/CB-SEM) for behavioral IS, causal identification and robustness for economics-of-IS, artifact evaluation for design science, or trustworthiness for qualitative IS — and assembling the genre-appropriate transparency materials. Executes/reports the analysis; it does not design the study (misq-methods) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill misq-data-analysis --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: MIS-Quarterly-Skills/skills/misq-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Data Analysis, Evaluation & Transparency (misq-data-analysis) ## When to trigger - Data are collected (or the artifact is built) and it is time to estimate, evaluate, and report - A reviewer probes measurement validity, identification, artifact utility, or replicability - You must prepare the pluralistic transparency materials uploaded at submission ## Analyze by tradition — there is no single MISQ estimator | Tradition | What to report | |-----------|----------------| | **Behavioral** | Reliability (alpha/CR), CFA or PLS measurement model, AVE, discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker / HTMT); structural paths with effect sizes; mediation via bootstrap CIs; moderation via simple slopes | | **Economics of IS** | The identifying variation, parallel-trends/exogeneity evidence, clustered SEs, and a battery of robustness checks (alternative specifications, placebo/event-time tests, sensitivity to assumptions) | | **Design science** | Artifact performance against credible baselines on held-out data; ablations; field/A-B or expert evaluation tied to the design propositions; cost/utility discussion | | **Organizational / qualitative** | A transparent data structure (codes → themes → dimen

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Analyze by tradition — there is no single MISQ estimator
  3. Behavioral IS: defend measurement before structure
  4. Economics of IS: make the causal claim earn its keep
  5. Design science: evaluate the artifact, not just the math
  6. Assemble the pluralistic transparency materials
  7. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  8. Checklist
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the misq-data-analysis skill do?

Use when running and reporting the empirical core of a MIS Quarterly manuscript — measurement and structural models (PLS/CB-SEM) for behavioral IS, causal identification and robustness for economics-of-IS, artifact evaluation for design science, or trustworthiness for qualitative IS — and assembling the genre-appropriate transparency materials. Executes/reports the analysis; it does not design the study (misq-methods) or frame the contribution (misq-contribution-framing).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill misq-data-analysis --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going