Agent skill · Testing & QA

micro-related-work

Use when building a MICRO paper's related-work coverage and positioning — sweeping the four-venue architecture literature plus journals and industry disclosures, differentiating by mechanism structure and cost rather than by numbers, obeying MICRO's all-author citation format, and verifying venue attribution via dblp before citing.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill micro-related-work --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: MICRO-Skills/skills/micro-related-work/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# MICRO Related Work At MICRO the related-work section is a *mechanism taxonomy*, not a bibliography tour. Reviewers — who probably wrote some of the cited papers — check three things: did you find the nearest mechanisms, do you know how yours differs structurally, and did you compare against the right one in the evaluation. ## The five lanes to sweep | Lane | Where it lives | What reviewers check | |---|---|---| | Direct ancestors of your mechanism | MICRO/ISCA/HPCA/ASPLOS, last ~5 years first, then classics | The named predecessor is in your evaluation, reimplemented (`micro-experiments`) | | Same problem, different layer | ASPLOS, OSDI/SOSP, PLDI (software attacks on your bottleneck) | You explain why hardware is still warranted | | Modeling & methodology you rely on | MICRO/ISCA tool papers (e.g., CACTI @ MICRO 2007, McPAT @ MICRO 2009), TACO/CAL journals | Versions cited match versions used | | Industry disclosures | Hot Chips talks, ISSCC papers, patents, vendor optimization manuals | A shipped equivalent of your idea would be fatal to novelty — find it before reviewers do | | Workload/characterization studies | IISWC, SIGMETRICS, arch venues | Your motivating characterizatio

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. The five lanes to sweep
  2. Differentiate on structure and cost, not adjectives
  3. Venue attribution: verify before you cite
  4. Handling your own preprints and prior papers
  5. Format and anonymity constraints on the section
  6. Timing the sweep
  7. Building the section under MICRO's page economics
  8. Output format
Commands it runs
dblp API: confirm venue + year + pages before the entry goes in the .bib
curl -s "https://dblp.org/search/publ/api?q=utility-based+cache+partitioning&format=json" \
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the micro-related-work skill do?

Use when building a MICRO paper's related-work coverage and positioning — sweeping the four-venue architecture literature plus journals and industry disclosures, differentiating by mechanism structure and cost rather than by numbers, obeying MICRO's all-author citation format, and verifying venue attribution via dblp before citing.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill micro-related-work --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going