mandat-arbeitsbereich-gesr-corporate

What it does

Manages Mandats-Workspaces for corporate law, creating, listing, switching between, closing, and archiving workspaces. It ensuresMandatsinhalte are kept contextually separated and redirects to appropriate steps based on mandate data. It supports creating concrete outputs like a decision matrix, register to-do list, and memo/ paper outputs for mandate decisions.

How it works

• Begin by clarifying role, target output, deadlines, and needed deliverables for the Mandats-Workspace task.
• Mark deadlines and urgent risks first, using only the specific field deadlines for the given law area; separate various timeframes (Widerspruch, Klage, etc.) and do not conflate with other domains.
• Verify applicable norms live from sources such as gesetze-im-internet.de, dejure.org, eur-lex.europa.eu, and official portals; cross-check live; avoid model-knowledge citations.
• Determine the responsible entity (Mandant, Gegner, authorities, experts, EU/international bodies).
• Collect documents and evidentiary materials (Verwaltungsakte, contracts, Schriftsätze, Bescheide, protocols, expert reports, external materials) and fill gaps via file access or client inquiry; perform live checks for normative changes and administrative practice.
• Produce an output product: a concrete Prüf- oder Entscheidungsmatrix with fields for Norm, Tatbestand, Beleg, Einwand, Risikoampel, and next steps; only escalate to deeper Skill when truly needed.

When to use it

• Use when creating or managing Mandats-Workspaces in corporate law contexts, especially for Gesellschaftsrecht/Mandatsworkspaces triggered by governance, M&A, or organizational actions. Trigger conditions include setting up a new mandate, switching mandates, closing, or archiving.

What it can touch

• Norms: GmbHG, AktG, HGB, BGB, UmwG, MoPeG, Gesellschafterliste, Registerrechte; Belege and Beweis-/Vollzugsrisiko are considered in output. It can generate documents like mandat.md, verlauf.md, and notizen.md (pathing and file creation implied). It relies on CLAUDE-code tools for instruction execution.

Caveats

• The skill explicitly does not perform conflict-of-interest checks; this is the lawyer's responsibility. It emphasizes live verification of norms and citations, forbids model-wisdom citations, and requires explicit sources with court decisions, dates, and docket numbers when citing jurisprudence.
• It assumes Mandats-Workspace creation follows a standard flow; deviations should be handled by routing to specialized skills.