Agent skill

literature-survey

Use when the user wants a comprehensive literature survey on a specific research topic. Outputs a complete PDF survey (6–20 pages, 60+ real citations, 100+ recommended) with LaTeX source, topic-specific publication figures, and a classified literature table. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

ai4s-research1,015★ · +146/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeships scriptsMIT
Install
npx skills add ai4s-research/ai4s-skills --skill literature-survey --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 12
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: yes
Path: skills/literature-survey/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 163
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Survey ## Overview End-to-end literature survey builder. **Single stage, full quality from the start.** The agent (Claude Code / Cursor / Aider / Codex / …) does the entire build using its own tools (WebFetch, WebSearch, Write, Bash). This SKILL is procedure + reference playbooks + LaTeX template — no Python runtime, no LLM SDK. The substantive work is decomposed into reference playbooks under `references/`: | Reference | Topic | |---|---| | `references/00-incremental-execution.md` | how to actually do this without losing work: batch sizes, persistence, resume — **read first** | | `references/01-bibliography-expansion.md` | grow `bibliography.bib` to 60+ real entries (100+ recommended) via WebFetch (no memory) | | `references/02-survey-figures.md` | taxonomy / timeline / coverage-matrix / area-map figures | | `references/03-survey-section-playbook.md` | per-section structure for survey-shaped papers | | `references/04-layout-discipline.md` | tables, figures, floats, cross-refs, author + disclosure footnote | | `references/05-quality-gate.md` | self-check before delivery | **Read the relevant reference _before_ writing, not after.** The full pass does not fit in a singl

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Overview
  2. When to Use
  3. When NOT to Use
  4. Workflow
  5. Step 1 — Understand the topic and scope
  6. Step 2 — Set up the run directory
  7. Step 3 — Build the survey (REQUIRED — this is the whole job)
  8. Step 4 — Deliver
  9. Cross-skill data flow (path convention)
  10. Important rules
Ships with 11 files
  • references/00-incremental-execution.md
  • references/01-bibliography-expansion.md
  • references/02-survey-figures.md
  • references/03-survey-section-playbook.md
  • references/04-layout-discipline.md
  • references/05-quality-gate.md
  • templates/survey/check_bibliography_freshness.py
  • templates/survey/compile.sh
  • templates/survey/figures/.gitkeep
  • templates/survey/main.tex
  • templates/survey/sections/.gitkeep
Commands it runs
mkdir -p "$RUN/sections" "$RUN/figures"
cp -r literature-survey/templates/survey/. "$RUN/"
ln -sfn "$TS" "output/literature-survey/$SLUG/latest"
cd "$RUN"
pdflatex -interaction=nonstopmode main.tex
bibtex main
More from ai4s-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the literature-survey skill do?

Use when the user wants a comprehensive literature survey on a specific research topic. Outputs a complete PDF survey (6–20 pages, 60+ real citations, 100+ recommended) with LaTeX source, topic-specific publication figures, and a classified literature table. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add ai4s-research/ai4s-skills --skill literature-survey --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From ai4s-research/ai4s-skills, a repository with 163 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going