Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

literature-review

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

majiayu000github.com/majiayu000GitHub ↗
codexclaude-codecan modify filesMIT
Install
npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill literature-review-sologa-codex-pipeline --agent codex

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for claude-code, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 2
SKILL.md size: 24 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Allowed tools: ReadWriteEditBash
Path: skills/analysis/literature-review-sologa-codex-pipeline/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 534
Language: HTML

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

Review
written from the skill's own SKILL.md · Aug 5, 2026

What it does

Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Searches multiple literature databases, synthesizes findings thematically, verifies citations for accuracy, and generates professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats. Integrates with tools for database access and provides specialized procedures for citation verification and document generation.

How it works

  • Integrates with databases and tooling for searching (e.g., PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar) and for data handling (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client).
  • Requires generating at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill before finalizing any document.
  • Uses a structured multi-phase workflow: planning and scoping, systematic search across databases, screening and selection (deduplication, title/abstract/full-text screening), data extraction, thematic synthesis, critical analysis, and writing the discussion.
  • In Phase 2, documents search parameters and exports results (including example markdown search strategies) and aggregates results via a post-processing script (python scripts/search_databases.py).
  • In Phase 3, performs deduplication (python search_databases.py results.json --deduplicate), screens titles and abstracts against inclusion/exclusion criteria, and records final included studies; creates a PRISMA-like flow diagram.
  • In Phase 4, extracts study data (metadata, design, size, findings, limitations, funding) and assesses quality with domain-appropriate tools.
  • In Phase 5, writes a thematic synthesis rather than study-by-study summaries, structures results by themes, compares approaches, and highlights consensus and controversies.
  • In Phase 6, verifies all citations using a verification script (python scripts/verify_citations.py my_literature_review.md) and ensures formatting in a chosen citation style (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
  • In Phase 7, generates a PDF (python scripts/generate_pdf.py my_literature_review.md --citation-style apa) and conducts a final quality checklist (including PRISMA diagram, fully documented search methodology, and accurate references).

When to use it

Use this skill for:

  • Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
  • Synthesizing current knowledge across multiple sources
  • Performing meta-analyses or scoping reviews
  • Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
  • Investigating the state of the art and identifying gaps
  • Requiring verified citations and professional formatting

What it can touch

  • Databases and tools for retrieval and processing: gget, bioservices, datacommons-client
  • Local scripts for processing: scripts/search_databases.py, scripts/verify_citations.py, scripts/generate_pdf.py
  • Output formats: Markdown and PDF documents, with citations formatted in APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.
  • Visualization assets generated via the scientific-schematics skill using the described command pattern:
    python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
    

Caveats

  • License is MIT; ensure compliance with any external data usage terms when integrating databases.
  • Preprints and non-peer-reviewed sources may require careful verification and caution during synthesis.
  • Visual schematics are mandatory and must be generated prior to finalizing documents.
  • Citations must be verified for accuracy before final submission.
From the SKILL.md

# Literature Review ## Overview Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats. This skill integrates with multiple scientific skills for database access (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client) and provides specialized tools for citation verification, result aggregation, and document generation. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when: - Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication - Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources - Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews - Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis - Investigating the state of the art in a research domain - Identifying research gaps and future directions - Requiring verified citations and professional formatting ## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics **⚠️ MANDATORY: Every literature review MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.** This is not optional.

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Overview
  2. When to Use This Skill
  3. Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
  4. Core Workflow
  5. Phase 1: Planning and Scoping
  6. Phase 2: Systematic Literature Search
  7. Phase 3: Screening and Selection
  8. Phase 4: Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
  9. Phase 5: Synthesis and Analysis
  10. Phase 6: Citation Verification
  11. Phase 7: Document Generation
  12. Database-Specific Search Guidance
  13. PubMed / PubMed Central
  14. bioRxiv / medRxiv
Ships with 1 file
  • metadata.json
Commands it runs
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
python search_databases.py combined_results.json \
python search_databases.py results.json --deduplicate --output unique_results.json
cp assets/review_template.md my_literature_review.md
python scripts/verify_citations.py my_literature_review.md
python scripts/generate_pdf.py my_literature_review.md \
Search PubMed
gget search pubmed "CRISPR gene editing" -l 100
Search with filters
Use PubMed Advanced Search Builder to construct complex queries
More from claude-skill-registry
All skills →
About this skill
What does the literature-review skill do?

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill literature-review-sologa-codex-pipeline --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, a repository with 534 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going