Agent skill · Testing & QA

lancet-fit

Use when scoping a project and before any writing, to stress-test whether a study clears The Lancet's bar — clinically or public-health important, globally relevant, and likely to change practice or policy, often with an equity lens. Decides The Lancet vs a Lancet family title vs another general medical journal.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill lancet-fit --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Lancet-Skills/skills/lancet-fit/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Scope & Significance Fit (lancet-fit) ## Why this is skill #1 The Lancet triages **most submissions to rejection without external review**. The gate is not "is the trial sound" — it is **"is this clinically or public-health important, globally relevant, and likely to change practice or policy."** A rigorous single-centre confirmatory study is rejected if it does not move practice for a broadly relevant problem. Run this before investing in prose. ## When to trigger - Before drafting, to decide if The Lancet is even the right venue. - When a co-investigator says "this is a Lancet paper" and you need a sober second opinion. - When choosing among The Lancet, the Lancet family, NEJM/JAMA/BMJ, and a specialty journal. ## The Lancet bar (four lenses) A strong Lancet paper usually scores on most of these: 1. **Clinical / public-health importance** — affects a common or high-burden condition, or a decision clinicians/policymakers actually face. 2. **Global relevance** — matters beyond a single high-income setting; ideally international or low/middle-income-country (LMIC) data, or a lesson that generalises globally. 3. **Practice- or policy-changing** — the result should alter a guideline

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Why this is skill #1
  2. When to trigger
  3. The Lancet bar (four lenses)
  4. Significance ladder (weak → strong)
  5. Fatal triage triggers
  6. Venue routing (within and beyond the Lancet family)
  7. Worked micro-example (illustrative numbers — not real data)
  8. Reviewer / editor-pushback patterns and the venue-specific fix
  9. Output format
  10. Anti-patterns
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the lancet-fit skill do?

Use when scoping a project and before any writing, to stress-test whether a study clears The Lancet's bar — clinically or public-health important, globally relevant, and likely to change practice or policy, often with an equity lens. Decides The Lancet vs a Lancet family title vs another general medical journal.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill lancet-fit --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going