jpube-review-process
Use when you need to understand or plan around the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE / JPubEc) editorial process — single anonymized review with a minimum of two reviewers, the Editorial Manager workflow, the Hendren–Kopczuk editorial leadership, SSRN preprint option, and the one-appeal policy. Explains the process; for the final file check use jpube-submission.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpube-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jpube-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to know what happens after you press submit at JPubE - You are deciding whether to post an SSRN preprint at submission - You need to plan timelines and expectations around the review model - A decision arrived and you are weighing whether to appeal ## How JPubE review works (verified facts) - **Single anonymized review.** Reviewers' identities are hidden from authors, but **authors' identities are known to reviewers and editors**. This is *not* double-anonymized — do not strip your name from the manuscript expecting blind review; write knowing referees see who you are. (Contrast: some venues use double-anonymized review.) - **Minimum of two reviewers.** Suitable submissions are typically sent to at least two reviewers; expect substantive, specialist public-finance reports. - **Editorial leadership.** The current ScienceDirect masthead lists **Editors Nathaniel Hendren (MIT)** and **Wojciech Kopczuk (Columbia)**, supported by co-editors and advisory editors. A handling editor manages your manuscript and synthesizes the reports into the decision. - **Editorial Manager workflow.** Submission and all correspondence r
- When to trigger
- How JPubE review works (verified facts)
- Appeals (verified)
- Planning implications
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Decision pathways after submit
- Worked vignette: deciding whether to appeal (illustrative)
- Calibration anchors
- Output format
What does the jpube-review-process skill do?
Use when you need to understand or plan around the Journal of Public Economics (JPubE / JPubEc) editorial process — single anonymized review with a minimum of two reviewers, the Editorial Manager workflow, the Hendren–Kopczuk editorial leadership, SSRN preprint option, and the one-appeal policy. Explains the process; for the final file check use jpube-submission.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpube-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.