jppm-review-process
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) review cycle — desk-screen logic, the mixed reviewer pool, decision types, and what an R&R typically demands. Reads the process and the letter; drafting the response is jppm-rebuttal.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jppm-review-process) ## When to trigger - A decision letter arrived and you must extract what the editors actually require - Estimating desk-reject risk before submitting - Reviews pull in different directions (methods reviewer vs. policy reviewer) and you need a strategy - Deciding whether an R&R is worth the added data work, or whether to reroute - Wondering how the editor transition affects a paper submitted under the old team ## How JPP&M review works Submissions enter SageTrack and go first to the **joint Editors in Chief** (Melissa Bublitz and Stacey Finkelstein for submissions from April 1, 2026; verify the current masthead), who desk-screen — the Policy Contribution Statement and abstract carry most of that decision — and assign surviving papers to an **associate editor** from the journal's AE board, who recruits reviewers under **double-anonymized** review. The reviewer pool is distinctive: alongside marketing academics, JPP&M draws scholars with law, policy, and public-health backgrounds and board members with agency or practice experience. Plan for the paper to be read simultaneously by someone auditing the estimator and someone auditing the policy real
- When to trigger
- How JPP&M review works
- The desk-reject patterns to pre-empt
- Reading the decision letter
- Decisions and what they mean
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jppm-review-process skill do?
Use when calibrating expectations for the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) review cycle — desk-screen logic, the mixed reviewer pool, decision types, and what an R&R typically demands. Reads the process and the letter; drafting the response is jppm-rebuttal.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.