Agent skill · Data & Analytics

jppm-methods

Use when choosing and designing the evidence for a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) manuscript — experiments with policy-realistic stimuli, quasi-experimental policy evaluation (DiD, RDD, synthetic control), surveys, field data, or meta-analysis. Designs the studies; it does not estimate them (jppm-data-analysis).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-methods --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Public-Policy-and-Marketing-Skills/skills/jppm-methods/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Methods & Evaluation Design (jppm-methods) ## When to trigger - Deciding whether the question needs an experiment, a policy evaluation, a survey, or a synthesis - A policy rolled out and you must find a credible counterfactual before claiming impact - Your label/disclosure experiment uses stimuli no agency could ever mandate - The sample excludes the very population the policy is meant to protect - You are combining lab and field evidence and need the pieces to carry distinct weight ## Methodological pluralism, disciplined by the policy question JPP&M accepts a wider methods palette than most marketing journals — randomized experiments, quasi-experimental evaluation, surveys, field and archival data, meta-analysis, qualitative work — but the choice must follow from the **policy inference** required. Two questions dominate: *Would the proposed instrument work?* (prospective — usually experiments with realistic stimuli) and *Did the enacted instrument work?* (retrospective — evaluation designs with explicit counterfactuals). A submission that answers the retrospective question with before/after trends, or the prospective one with fantasy stimuli, fails regardless of statistical pol

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Methodological pluralism, disciplined by the policy question
  3. Prospective designs: policy-realistic experiments
  4. Retrospective designs: evaluation with a counterfactual
  5. Surveys, qualitative work, and synthesis
  6. Checklist
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jppm-methods skill do?

Use when choosing and designing the evidence for a Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (JPP&M) manuscript — experiments with policy-realistic stimuli, quasi-experimental policy evaluation (DiD, RDD, synthetic control), surveys, field data, or meta-analysis. Designs the studies; it does not estimate them (jppm-data-analysis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jppm-methods --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going