Agent skill · Data & Analytics

jpart-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) manuscript against the public-administration literature so it reads as a theory contribution, not a fresh data point. JPART expects engagement with the specific PA conversation (PSM, red tape, representation, performance, governance) the paper advances. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpart-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Public-Administration-Research-and-Theory-Skills/skills/jpart-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (jpart-literature-positioning) JPART reviewers are public-management theorists. A paper that cites a pile of PA work but never names the **conversation it advances** reads as atheoretical and stalls. The goal is to place the paper inside a live PA debate and state precisely what it changes. ## When to trigger - Drafting or revising the introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said you "missed the core PA literature" or "don't engage the theory you claim to test" - Your empirics are clean but the framing doesn't connect to a named PA theory - You need to distinguish your contribution from the closest prior JPART/PAR papers ## How JPART wants the literature engaged 1. **Name the conversation, not a citation pile.** Identify the specific PA debate — e.g., *does PSM survive once selection is accounted for?*, *is red tape distinct from administrative burden?*, *does passive representation become active under which conditions?* Cite the works that *constitute* it. 2. **Engage the theory you claim to test.** If the paper is "about" representative bureaucracy or PSM, it must engage that theory's canonical statements and its current frontier — not

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How JPART wants the literature engaged
  3. Contribution moves JPART reviewers can recognize
  4. Engagement depth by paper type
  5. Positioning audit
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
  8. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jpart-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART) manuscript against the public-administration literature so it reads as a theory contribution, not a fresh data point. JPART expects engagement with the specific PA conversation (PSM, red tape, representation, performance, governance) the paper advances. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jpart-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going