jop-rebuttal
Use when writing the response to a The Journal of Politics (JOP) revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor, stay within JOP's page budget, keep the manuscript double-blind, and preserve replicability so the eventual JOP replication-analyst check passes. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jop-rebuttal --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# R&R Rebuttal (jop-rebuttal) A JOP **R&R is a strong signal** — the editor sees a path to publication. The response letter must move *every* reviewer toward yes while keeping the editor confident the revision is convergent, and it must do so without **blowing the page budget**, **breaking double-blind anonymity**, or **breaking replicability** that the analyst will later check. ## When to trigger - An R&R decision arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter - Reviewers disagree with each other and you must reconcile their demands - A reviewer requests analyses that would change the paper's claims or its length - Writing the cover note to the editor summarizing the revision ## Strategy 1. **Read the editor's letter as the rubric.** The editor signals which points are decisive. Solve those first; the editor adjudicates disagreements among reviewers. 2. **One point-by-point response, every comment addressed.** Quote each comment, then respond. Never skip one — silence reads as non-compliance. 3. **Concede or rebut explicitly, with evidence.** For each: did what was asked (say where, with the new text/table number), or push back **respectfully with a reason** (theory,
- When to trigger
- Strategy
- Response-letter format
- Anti-patterns
- Triage table for reviewer demands
- Worked micro-example (illustrative)
- Referee pushback patterns and the JOP fix
- Output format
- Supplementary resources
What does the jop-rebuttal skill do?
Use when writing the response to a The Journal of Politics (JOP) revise-and-resubmit. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor, stay within JOP's page budget, keep the manuscript double-blind, and preserve replicability so the eventual JOP replication-analyst check passes. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jop-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.