jole-review-process
Use to understand how the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) actually reviews a paper — single-blind refereeing, the non-refundable submission fee, Editorial Manager, the SOLE society tie, and what labor referees expect. Explains the process; it does not draft the manuscript.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jole-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jole-review-process) ## When to trigger - You are unsure whether JOLE is double-blind (it is not) and how that changes the submission - You need to budget for the submission fee and understand when the decision is released - You want to know what labor-economics referees and editors look for before you submit - You are calibrating expectations for an R&R versus a reject ## How JOLE review works - **Single-blind (single-anonymized).** Referees are anonymous, but they **know the authors' identities**. Because of this the manuscript is **not** anonymized: it begins with a title page naming all co-authors, their institutions, and emails, and references are **not** blinded. Do not strip identifying material — that is correct for double-blind journals but wrong here. - **Submission via Editorial Manager** (`editorialmanager.com/jole`), with a cover letter. JOLE is the official journal of the **Society of Labor Economists (SOLE)** and is published by the **University of Chicago Press**. - **Non-refundable submission fee (since July 1, 2018): $100 for SOLE members, $175 for non-members.** It is charged **even if the paper is desk-rejected**, and the **decision is not rele
- When to trigger
- How JOLE review works
- What labor referees expect
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
- Supplementary resources
What does the jole-review-process skill do?
Use to understand how the Journal of Labor Economics (JOLE) actually reviews a paper — single-blind refereeing, the non-refundable submission fee, Editorial Manager, the SOLE society tie, and what labor referees expect. Explains the process; it does not draft the manuscript.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jole-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.