joe-review-process
Use to understand and navigate the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) editorial process — single-anonymized review, editor screening before a minimum of two referees, the three submission tracks (Regular/Annals/Themed), Guest Associate Editors, and what referees of a methods paper look for.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joe-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (joe-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to know how JoE evaluates a methodological submission, end to end - You are choosing among the Regular / Annals / Themed Issue tracks - You are anticipating referee objections before submitting or after a revision request - You are unsure who decides (editors, Co-Editors, Guest Associate Editors) ## How JoE review works - **Single-anonymized review:** referees know the authors' identities; authors do **not** know the referees. - **Editor screening first:** editors screen submissions; suitable papers are sent to a **minimum of two independent expert referees**, and the editors make the **final decision**. Unsuitable or out-of-scope papers are desk-screened out. - **Co-Editors-in-Chief:** Michael Jansson (UC Berkeley) and Aureo de Paula (UCL), supported by a set of Co-Editors. Check the live board page for the complete current roster before naming a handling editor. ## The three submission tracks - **Regular Issues** — standard standalone methodological papers; the default route. - **Annals Issues** — focused volumes assembled around a coherent theme. - **Themed Issues** — topic-based collections, often originating f
- When to trigger
- How JoE review works
- The three submission tracks
- What methods referees look for
- Practical reading of the process
- Editor-screen packet
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the joe-review-process skill do?
Use to understand and navigate the Journal of Econometrics (JoE) editorial process — single-anonymized review, editor screening before a minimum of two referees, the three submission tracks (Regular/Annals/Themed), Guest Associate Editors, and what referees of a methods paper look for.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joe-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.