Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

joap-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript against the I-O literature so the theoretical contribution is unmistakable. JAP expects the gap and the advance stated against the closest prior work — and a clear distinction from sibling venues (Personnel Psychology, AMJ, OBHDP, JOB). Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Applied-Psychology-Skills/skills/joap-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (joap-literature-positioning) In JAP, positioning is where the **theoretical contribution becomes legible**. The introduction must name the open question, the closest prior work, and exactly **what this paper adds to I-O theory** — and it must make clear why the work belongs in JAP rather than a sibling journal. Positioning is argument construction, not a literature survey. ## When to trigger - Drafting or sharpening the Introduction and the "contribution" paragraph - A reviewer said the contribution is "incremental," "not clearly novel," or "overlaps prior work" - You have far more citations than the argument needs and must prioritize - A reviewer suggested the paper "fits another journal better" ## How to position 1. **Open with the phenomenon and its stakes**, for work and for theory — not a textbook history of the construct. 2. **Name the gap precisely.** What is unresolved, contested, or untested in I-O theory — and why settling it matters. Avoid "little is known about X at work." 3. **State the contribution against the closest prior study.** By the end of the Introduction the reader knows the mechanism, the level, and what is new relative to the *spec

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How to position
  3. Sibling-venue boundary (position deliberately)
  4. Worked micro-example (illustrative)
  5. Citation-budget triage
  6. Positioning-stage reviewer pushback and the venue fix
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the joap-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) manuscript against the I-O literature so the theoretical contribution is unmistakable. JAP expects the gap and the advance stated against the closest prior work — and a clear distinction from sibling venues (Personnel Psychology, AMJ, OBHDP, JOB). Stakes the contribution; it does not write the literature review.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill joap-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going