Agent skill · Workflow & Productivity

jmsc-workflow

Use when deciding which jmsc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript from decision-problem formulation through rebuttal. The key fork is 数理 (model/proof/algorithm) vs 经验实证 (regression/survey). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmsc-workflow --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 3 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Management-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/jmsc-workflow/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 《管理科学学报》工作流(jmsc-workflow) ## 总览 这是路由器,不替代任何专用 skill。它告诉你**当前阶段该用哪个 jmsc-* skill**。 默认假设:目标是数理/定量管理科学顶刊《管理科学学报》(国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部 + 天津大学主办,月刊)。衡量标准是**方法贡献与数理严谨性**——模型、证明、算法、数值实验,而非政策含义或经验叙事。基础事实见 `resources/journal-profile.md`。 ## 关键分叉:数理 vs 经验实证 落笔前先判断稿件的**交付物形态**: - **数理型**(本刊主线):决策问题 → 模型 → 命题/定理(有证明)→ 算法(复杂度/收敛)→ 数值实验 → 管理洞见。 - **经验实证型**:因变量 + 回归识别 + 政策含义,或问卷-SEM——**多半不对口**,先过 `jmsc-fit-positioning`,再决定改投。 ## 触发时机 - 用户问"这篇能不能投《管理科学学报》/ 下一步做什么" - 有模型但命题没证明,或算法没复杂度分析 - 手头是回归结果 + 政策建议,不确定是否对口 - 收到外审意见需要回复 ## 路由表 | 当前症状 | 下一个 Skill | |----------|-------------| | 不确定对不对口(像回归+政策 / 问卷-SEM) | `jmsc-fit-positioning` | | 决策问题说不清楚、要素散乱 | `jmsc-problem-formulation` | | 模型设定不完整(变量/约束/目标/假设缺项) | `jmsc-model-building` | | 有结论但没命题/定理,或证明不全 | `jmsc-proofs` | | 算法没复杂度 / 没收敛性论证 | `jmsc-algorithm` | | 没数值实验,或实验单薄、没洞见 | `jmsc-numerical-experiments` | | 用实验数据刻画行为偏差(行为运作) | `jmsc-behavioral-om` | | 管理启示写成政策口号 | `jmsc-managerial-insights` | | 记号混乱 / 假设不显式 / 正文被证明压垮 | `jmsc-notation-style` | | 准备投稿,需要体例与系统 checklist | `jmsc-submission` | | 收到外审意见,需要写回复 | `jmsc-rebuttal` | ## 默认顺序(数理主线) 1. `jmsc-fit-positioning` — 先判数理 vs 经验,别把回归稿硬投数理刊 2. `jmsc-problem-formulation` — 把决策问题形式化 3. `jmsc-model-building` —

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 总览
  2. 关键分叉:数理 vs 经验实证
  3. 触发时机
  4. 路由表
  5. 默认顺序(数理主线)
  6. 决策口诀
  7. 与本仓库其它期刊包的差异
  8. 本刊全流程审稿期待与卡点模式
  9. 微型走查:一份稿件的路由轨迹
  10. 反模式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmsc-workflow skill do?

Use when deciding which jmsc-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript from decision-problem formulation through rebuttal. The key fork is 数理 (model/proof/algorithm) vs 经验实证 (regression/survey). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmsc-workflow --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going