Agent skill · AI & Agents

jmsc-behavioral-om

Use when taking the behavioral operations (行为运作) path of a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript — designing controlled experiments, manipulation checks, and a behavioral model that identifies the bias parameter, so the contribution is a model that explains behavior, not just an effect. Use when human decisions are the object of study instead of pure analytical modeling; use when reviewers ask where the identifiable behavioral parameter is.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmsc-behavioral-om --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 4 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Management-Sciences-in-China-Skills/skills/jmsc-behavioral-om/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 行为运作(jmsc-behavioral-om) ## 触发时机 - 研究对象是**人的决策偏差**(如订货偏差、心理账户、公平偏好) - 有实验数据,想用它**校准/检验一个行为模型** - 审稿质疑"只是做了个实验,行为模型在哪/能否识别" - 不确定走纯解析建模还是行为实验路径 ## 核心:实验 + 可识别的行为模型 行为运作在本刊的对口姿势是**实验设计规范 + 行为模型识别并重**:不仅报告"被试偏离最优",更要用一个含**行为参数**的模型刻画偏差,并从数据中**识别该参数**。只有实验、没有模型 → 偏心理学,不对口。 ## 实验设计规范 - **因果设计**:操纵自变量、随机分配、控制混淆;明确处理组/对照组。 - **激励相容**:报酬与决策绩效挂钩,避免无成本作答(hypothetical bias)。 - **操纵检验(manipulation check)**:确认被试确实感知到了被操纵的变量。 - **样本与功效**:报告样本量、被试来源、功效分析依据。 - **预注册/稳健性**:若可行,预注册假设;报告对异常值/学习效应的处理。 ## 行为模型与识别 | 环节 | 要求 | |------|------| | 基准模型 | 给出理性最优作为对照(偏差相对它度量) | | 行为模型 | 引入行为参数(如损失厌恶 λ、公平 α、锚定权重) | | 识别 | 说明参数如何从实验数据估计;是否可识别(变异来源) | | 检验 | 行为模型 vs 理性模型的拟合比较(似然/信息准则) | | 稳健 | 替代行为设定、个体异质性、稳健标准误 | ## 执行桥(StatsPAI / Stata MCP) 把设计**跑出来并审计**,而不是只做描述。完整映射见 [`execution-with-mcp`](../../../shared-resources/empirical-methods/execution-with-mcp.md)。《管理科学学报》以解析/运筹/建模为主——优化、算法、数值实验与证明不在该因果推断工具链内;下面的链路服务其行为运营(behavioral-om)等实证支线。 - `detect_design` → `recommend` → 用 `as_handle=true` 拟合 → `audit_result` 列出尚欠的检查。 - **观察性因果:**交错 DID(`callaway_santanna` / `sun_abraham` + `bacon_decomposition` + `honest_did_from_result`);IV(`effective_f_test` + `anderson_rubin_ci`);RDD(`rdrobust` + `mccrary_test`)。 - **实验:**随

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 核心:实验 + 可识别的行为模型
  3. 实验设计规范
  4. 行为模型与识别
  5. 执行桥(StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  6. 自检清单
  7. 反模式
  8. 本刊行为运作审稿期待与退稿模式
  9. 微型走查:报童订货偏差的行为模型识别
  10. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmsc-behavioral-om skill do?

Use when taking the behavioral operations (行为运作) path of a 《管理科学学报》 (Journal of Management Sciences in China) manuscript — designing controlled experiments, manipulation checks, and a behavioral model that identifies the bias parameter, so the contribution is a model that explains behavior, not just an effect. Use when human decisions are the object of study instead of pure analytical modeling; use when reviewers ask where the identifiable behavioral parameter is.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmsc-behavioral-om --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going