jms-review-process
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS) editorial and peer-review process — desk screening, double-blind developmental review, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (jms-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Understanding the Review Process (jms-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to calibrate expectations about timeline, desk-reject odds, and decision types - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it (R&R vs. reject; major vs. minor) - You are unsure how much weight reviewers vs. the handling editor carry - You want to plan a revision strategy before drafting the response (then go to `jms-rebuttal`) > Editorial structure, named editors, and exact turnaround change; verify the current team and policies on the official Wiley/SAMS pages. As of `检索于 2026-06；以官网为准`: JMS uses **double-blind** review; the editorial office is at **Durham University**; the General Editors/Editor-in-Chief and exact timelines are **待核实** unless quoted from an official page at submission time. The norms below are durable. ## How JMS review works (durable norms) 1. **Submission & routing.** A fully anonymised manuscript enters via ScholarOne (mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jmstudies). A General Editor (or an Associate/handling Editor) screens it and, if it passes, routes it to a handling editor in the relevant area. 2. **Desk decision.** Manuscripts that are off-fit, that lack a clear
- When to trigger
- How JMS review works (durable norms)
- JMS is developmental and pluralist
- Reading the decision letter
- Planning the revision
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jms-review-process skill do?
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management Studies (JMS) editorial and peer-review process — desk screening, double-blind developmental review, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (jms-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jms-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.