jmr-review-process
Use when understanding how the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) review process works — initial editorial evaluation and possible desk rejection, double-anonymized review, the EIC-plus-Coeditor domain-routing model, the requirement of two independent reviews to reach a Revise/Accept decision, and how to read a JMR decision letter. Sets expectations; jmr-rebuttal drafts the response.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Understanding the JMR Review Process (jmr-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to set realistic expectations for timing and decisions - After a decision letter, to interpret what the editor and reviewers are signaling - You are unsure how JMR routes papers or how many reviews are required - You want to understand the difference between a desk reject and a post-review reject ## How JMR routing works JMR uses an **EIC + Coeditor** model. A single **Editor-in-Chief** oversees a panel of **Coeditors** (currently four; the incoming 2026–2029 team has five) who handle manuscripts by **methodological/substantive domain**, alongside **Associate Editors** and an **Editorial Review Board**. This is analogous to INFORMS-style departmental routing, but organized around methodological/substantive domains rather than fixed departments. Practical implication: your domain keywords and article type at submission influence which Coeditor/AE your paper reaches, so choose them to land with an expert in your area. JMR does **not** publish a by-domain routing chart, so treat this routing guidance as a masthead-based inference rather than an official AMA rule. > Transition note: Rebe
- When to trigger
- How JMR routing works
- The stages
- Read the decision letter by genre
- Set expectations
- First 48 hours with the letter
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
- Resources
What does the jmr-review-process skill do?
Use when understanding how the Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) review process works — initial editorial evaluation and possible desk rejection, double-anonymized review, the EIC-plus-Coeditor domain-routing model, the requirement of two independent reviews to reach a Revise/Accept decision, and how to read a JMR decision letter. Sets expectations; jmr-rebuttal drafts the response.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.