Agent skill · Content & Marketing

jmr-contribution-framing

Use when turning results into an explicit contribution statement for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — clearing JMR's dual bar by stating both the substantive/theoretical insight and, where relevant, the methodological advance. Frames why marketing researchers should care because the design is credible.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-contribution-framing --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Marketing-Research-Skills/skills/jmr-contribution-framing/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Contribution Framing (jmr-contribution-framing) ## When to trigger - Results exist but the "so what for marketing research" is thin or implicit - A reviewer says the contribution is "incremental" or "an application" - You are unsure whether to lead with the substantive insight or the method - The discussion restates results instead of stating what was learned ## Clear JMR's dual bar explicitly JMR is the AMA's methods-forward flagship, and it judges papers on **two** contributions at once. State both, in the introduction and the discussion: 1. **Substantive / theoretical** — What do we now know about consumers, markets, or marketing actions that we did not before? What belief is changed, qualified, or newly established? 2. **Methodological credibility / advance** — Why is this believable? Either the design credibly identifies the effect (so the substantive claim is trustworthy), or the paper itself contributes a new method/measure that other researchers can reuse. A paper that nails one bar but not the other is the canonical JMR reject: a credible-but-uninteresting result, or an interesting-but-unidentified claim. ## Lead with the right bar for your genre - **Behavioral** — lead

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Clear JMR's dual bar explicitly
  3. Lead with the right bar for your genre
  4. Write the contribution sentences
  5. Contrast with the sister journals
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Contribution pass for Journal of Marketing Research
  8. Output format
  9. Resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmr-contribution-framing skill do?

Use when turning results into an explicit contribution statement for a Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) manuscript — clearing JMR's dual bar by stating both the substantive/theoretical insight and, where relevant, the methodological advance. Frames why marketing researchers should care because the design is credible.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmr-contribution-framing --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going