Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

jmgmt-topic-selection

Use when scoping the question and choosing the article type for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — empirical vs. meta-analysis vs. systematic review, and which management subfield it speaks to. Locks fit; it does not build the theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or design the study (jmgmt-methods).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Management-Skills/skills/jmgmt-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection & Fit (jmgmt-topic-selection) ## When to trigger - You have a phenomenon but are unsure it reads as a **general-management** contribution rather than a niche subfield piece - You cannot decide whether to write an **empirical study**, a **meta-analysis**, or a **systematic review** for a Review Issue - The paper could plausibly go to AMJ, SMJ, JMS, or Org Science and you need to know whether JOM is the right home - A coauthor asks "would JOM desk-reject this?" ## What JOM is looking for JOM is the **Southern Management Association's** general-management flagship (SAGE). Its center of gravity is a **theoretical contribution that travels across management** — organizational behavior, HR, strategic management, entrepreneurship, and research methods, plus related I/O psychology. A paper earns its place when a reader in a *different* management subfield still cares about the mechanism. The desk filter is the same one AMJ uses — empirical contribution, theoretical contribution, and a phenomenon that matters — but JOM has one extra door most siblings lack: it actively publishes **stand-alone reviews and meta-analyses** as flagship contributions (biannual Review Issues, Ja

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. What JOM is looking for
  3. Choosing the article type
  4. Sibling boundary (where JOM differs)
  5. Sizing the question against the 50-page wall
  6. Worked example (illustrative)
  7. Quick self-test before committing
  8. When the answer is "not JOM"
  9. Checklist
  10. Anti-patterns
  11. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jmgmt-topic-selection skill do?

Use when scoping the question and choosing the article type for a Journal of Management (JOM) manuscript — empirical vs. meta-analysis vs. systematic review, and which management subfield it speaks to. Locks fit; it does not build the theory (jmgmt-theory-development) or design the study (jmgmt-methods).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going