jmgmt-review-process
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management (JOM) editorial and masked-review process — desk screening, the developmental R&R culture, the Review Issue track, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (jmgmt-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Understanding the Review Process (jmgmt-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to calibrate expectations about timeline and decision types - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it (R&R vs. reject; major vs. minor) - You are unsure how reviewers vs. the action editor weigh in under masked review - You are routing a review/meta-analysis and want to know how the Review Issue track works - You want to plan a revision strategy before drafting the response (then go to `jmgmt-rebuttal`) > Editorial structure, named editors, and timelines change. Verify the current team and turnaround on the SAGE JOM page; the norms below are durable. As of 2026-06: JOM uses **masked (double-blind) review** with an **anonymized data transparency table**, is **developmental and multi-round**, and the Editor-in-Chief is **Cynthia E. Devers (Virginia Tech)** (检索于 2026-06；以官网为准). ## How JOM review works (durable norms) 1. **Submission & routing.** The Editor-in-Chief or a deputy/associate editor screens the masked manuscript and routes it to an action editor in the relevant domain (OB, HR, strategy, entrepreneurship, methods). Submission is via SAGE/ScholarOne, fully anonymiz
- When to trigger
- How JOM review works (durable norms)
- The Review Issue track
- JOM is developmental and multi-round
- Reading the decision letter
- Worked example (illustrative)
- Calibrating expectations before you submit
- How much weight reviewers vs. the action editor carry
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jmgmt-review-process skill do?
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Journal of Management (JOM) editorial and masked-review process — desk screening, the developmental R&R culture, the Review Issue track, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (jmgmt-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.