jmgmt-rebuttal
Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers for a Journal of Management (JOM) R&R — the point-by-point letter, the editor-first revision strategy, handling masked-reviewer conflicts, and staying within the 50-page limit across rounds. Drafts and structures the response; it does not run new analyses (jmgmt-data-analysis) or rebuild the theory (jmgmt-theory-development).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-rebuttal --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Rebuttal & Response Letter (jmgmt-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - A JOM R&R arrived and you need a response-letter strategy - Reviewers disagree and you must resolve the conflict for the action editor - You are tempted to argue with a reviewer rather than revise - The revision risks pushing the paper over the **50-page** limit - You need to show, not just assert, that you addressed the theoretical-contribution and method concerns ## The JOM rebuttal stance JOM's review is **developmental and masked**, so the response letter is read by the action editor and the (anonymous) reviewers as evidence of whether the paper can become publishable. Two principles govern everything: **the editor's priorities come first**, and **revise before you rebut** — when you disagree, you must still respond with new analysis, theory, or evidence, not just a counter-argument. A defensive letter that wins arguments but changes nothing is the most common way a viable R&R dies. ## Structure of the response 1. **Cover note to the action editor.** Thank the editor; restate the contribution; summarize the *major* changes; flag any place where reviewers conflicted and how you resolved it. Mirror the editor's st
- When to trigger
- The JOM rebuttal stance
- Structure of the response
- Handling the recurring JOM concerns
- Resolving masked-reviewer conflict
- Length discipline across rounds
- Sample response entry (illustrative)
- Preparing for the next round
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jmgmt-rebuttal skill do?
Use when drafting the response-to-reviewers for a Journal of Management (JOM) R&R — the point-by-point letter, the editor-first revision strategy, handling masked-reviewer conflicts, and staying within the 50-page limit across rounds. Drafts and structures the response; it does not run new analyses (jmgmt-data-analysis) or rebuild the theory (jmgmt-theory-development).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jmgmt-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.