jm-review-process
Use when understanding how Journal of Marketing (JM) review and decisions work — the double-anonymized process, the Coeditor structure, the substantive-and-relevance evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jm-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jm-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jm-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to set realistic expectations about JM review - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it before responding - You are unsure who decides at JM and what reviewers are told to weigh - You want to know what "conditional acceptance" triggers (replication packet) ## How JM review works - **Double-anonymized**: identities of authors and reviewers are concealed from each other. Keep all rounds anonymized; never reveal yourself in responses or revised files. - **Decision authority**: the handling **Editor is the final decision authority**. Under EiC Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp (UNC; term began **July 1, 2025**, three-year term — verified 2026-06-22), manuscripts are handled by one of four **Coeditors** — Marc Fischer (Cologne), Kelly L. Haws (Vanderbilt), Maura L. Scott (Arizona State), Rebecca J. Slotegraaf (Indiana). Your keyword/area choices influence routing. Re-verify the live roster before naming a Coeditor. - **What reviewers weigh**: JM's gatekeeping criterion is **substantive impact** — does the paper offer compelling new insight into an important real-world marketing question, *with* manager
- When to trigger
- How JM review works
- Likely decisions
- Reading the decision letter
- At conditional acceptance
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jm-review-process skill do?
Use when understanding how Journal of Marketing (JM) review and decisions work — the double-anonymized process, the Coeditor structure, the substantive-and-relevance evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jm-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jm-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.