Agent skill · Design & Presentation

jleo-identification

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an empirical Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — institutional/organizational causal designs (reforms, institutional variation, court/committee/case assignment, governance-form choice). Stress-tests the design to JLEO's institutional bar; it does not build the theory model (jleo-theory-model).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-identification --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Law-Economics-and-Organization-Skills/skills/jleo-identification/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Identification Strategy (jleo-identification) ## When to trigger - The causal claim rests on OLS + controls, or TWFE on staggered institutional reforms - The unit chooses its own governance form (make-or-buy, integration, contract type) and the estimate confounds selection with effect - The "treatment" is a court/committee/judge/case assignment whose as-good-as-random status is asserted but not shown - A referee asks "what is the source of variation that identifies this institutional effect?" - The design borrows institutional variation across countries/states/firms without ruling out the obvious confounds ## The JLEO identification bar JLEO empirics live or die on whether the **institutional or organizational variation** that does the identifying is credible — because the object of interest is usually itself chosen by the agents (firms pick governance forms; legislatures pick rules; litigants select into courts). The credible-identification standards are the same as any top empirical economics journal, but the *threats* are institution-specific: endogenous boundaries, endogenous reform timing, selection into contract form, and strategic case selection. Name the variation, defend

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The JLEO identification bar
  3. Design branches and their institution-specific threats
  4. Reforms / institutional change (DID, event study)
  5. Governance-form / make-or-buy choice (the classic TCE empirics)
  6. Court / committee / judge / case assignment
  7. Cross-institutional variation (states, countries, firms)
  8. IV / RDD where applicable
  9. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  10. Checklist
  11. Anti-patterns
  12. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  13. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jleo-identification skill do?

Use when the identification argument is the bottleneck for an empirical Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (JLEO) manuscript — institutional/organizational causal designs (reforms, institutional variation, court/committee/case assignment, governance-form choice). Stress-tests the design to JLEO's institutional bar; it does not build the theory model (jleo-theory-model).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jleo-identification --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going