Agent skill · Workflow & Productivity

jle-rebuttal

Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jle-identification / jle-robustness) or the submission preflight (jle-submission).

brycew6m4,252★ · +31/wk · 3 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jle-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 8 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Law-and-Economics-Skills/skills/jle-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Rebuttal & Response Letter (jle-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - A JLE **R&R** or **conditional acceptance** decision letter has arrived - You need to triage referee comments into must-do / argue / defer - You are drafting the response-to-referees document and revision plan - A reject-and-resubmit invitation needs a strategy before re-engaging ## How to read a JLE decision The handling editor's letter is the **priority signal**: it tells you which referee concerns are binding and which are optional. At JLE the binding asks are almost always about (1) **whether the legal institution is described correctly and the rule binds as claimed**, and (2) **the credibility of the legal identification** (the staggered-timing estimator, the parallel-trends story, the random-assignment defense), before exposition. Because review is **single-blind**, the editor and referees know who you are — a gracious, evidence-led, non-defensive tone is worth more than at a blinded journal, and self-citation should stay honest. Address the editor's stated priorities first and in full; the revision is judged on whether the **identification and institutional concerns are genuinely resolved**, not on the volume o

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How to read a JLE decision
  3. Response-letter structure
  4. Triage table
  5. Checklist
  6. Pacing a JLE revision
  7. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  8. Handling the institutional-correction ask (distinctive at JLE)
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jle-rebuttal skill do?

Use when a The Journal of Law and Economics (JLE) decision letter arrives (R&R or conditional accept) and a response-to-referees letter plus a revision plan must be drafted. Plans and structures the response; it does not run the new analysis (jle-identification / jle-robustness) or the submission preflight (jle-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jle-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going