Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

jibs-review-process

Use when setting expectations for, or interpreting, the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) editorial process — the desk-screen, double-blind review, area-editor routing by IB subfield, the methods-editorial standards reviewers apply, and how to read a JIBS decision letter. Explains the process; the response letter itself is drafted with jibs-rebuttal.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jibs-review-process --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-International-Business-Studies-Skills/skills/jibs-review-process/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Understanding JIBS Review (jibs-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to calibrate expectations for the JIBS process - You received a JIBS decision letter and need to interpret it - You are unsure how area editors and the methods canon shape your review - You want to know what "revise and resubmit" implies at JIBS specifically ## How the JIBS process works 1. **Editorial desk-screen.** Submissions are first screened by the editorial team for fit and contribution before going to reviewers; weak-fit or phenomenon-free papers can be desk-rejected quickly. (The EIC vision piece reports an approximate ~5-day desk-reject and ~62-day first-decision target — treat as indicative, not guaranteed.) 2. **Area-editor routing.** JIBS uses a departmental/area-editor structure organized by IB subfield (economics-finance-accounting, strategy, organization & management, marketing & operations, entrepreneurship, political economy/public policy, culture-conflict-cognition, HR/IR). Your keyword/area choice routes the paper; the area editor manages the review and writes the integrative decision. 3. **Double-blind review.** Authors and reviewers are mutually anonymous; usually multipl

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How the JIBS process works
  3. What reviewers hold you to
  4. Reviewer archetypes on a JIBS panel
  5. Translating recurring decision-letter phrases
  6. Reading a JIBS decision letter
  7. Output format
  8. Anti-patterns
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jibs-review-process skill do?

Use when setting expectations for, or interpreting, the Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) editorial process — the desk-screen, double-blind review, area-editor routing by IB subfield, the methods-editorial standards reviewers apply, and how to read a JIBS decision letter. Explains the process; the response letter itself is drafted with jibs-rebuttal.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jibs-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going