Agent skill · Business & Finance

jfr-heterogeneity

Use when the heterogeneity analysis of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript is too coarse or atheoretical — to cut along finance-relevant dimensions (ownership, bank type, market segment, financing constraint, region) that the mechanism predicts, not arbitrary splits.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfr-heterogeneity --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 2 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Financial-Research-Skills/skills/jfr-heterogeneity/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# 异质性分析(jfr-heterogeneity) ## 触发时机 - 没做异质性,或只切了"东中西" - 切分维度与机制无关,纯粹试着切 - 审稿人会问"这效应对谁更强、为什么" ## 原则:异质性要由机制预测,而非数据探鱼 每个切分维度都应能从渠道机制**事前推断方向**:渠道说该群体更敏感,数据若印证,机制更可信;若反向,要么机制错、要么有竞争渠道。 ## 金融相关的切分维度(对照表) | 维度 | 适用线别 | 机制预期 | |------|----------|----------| | **所有制**(国有 vs 民营) | 公司金融 | 软预算/隐性担保 → 信贷与融资约束差异 | | **银行类型**(国有大行/股份/城商/农商) | 银行信贷 | 资本约束、客户结构 → 风险承担与信贷反应差异 | | **融资约束**(KZ/SA/WW 指数等) | 公司金融 | 约束越紧,信贷/资产负债表渠道越强 | | **市场分割/上市板块**(主板/科创/创业/北交) | 资本市场 | 制度差异 → 定价与信息效率差异 | | **货币政策环境**(宽松 vs 紧缩期) | 宏观传导 | 风险承担渠道在宽松期更强 | | **地区/金融发展** | 两线皆可 | 金融发展水平调节传导强度 | | **企业规模/行业/抵押品** | 公司金融 | 抵押品多寡 → 资产负债表渠道 | ## 写法要点 - 每个维度**先讲机制预期,再看结果**,结果与预期对话 - 区分**统计显著的差异**与**经济上有意义的差异**(用组间系数差异检验,而非各自显著) - 异质性应反哺机制结论(与 jfr-mechanism 闭环) ## 自检清单 - [ ] 切分维度由机制事前预测方向 - [ ] 维度是金融相关(所有制/银行类型/约束/市场分层等),非笼统地理 - [ ] 报告组间系数差异检验,不只看各组显著性 - [ ] 异质性方向与机制一致;不一致已解释 - [ ] 不堆砌无理论的切分 ## 微型走查:把"利率市场化 × 银行风险承担"切对维度 示意稿,数字均为虚构演示: - **先写机制预期**:风险承担渠道预测——**资本约束更紧、客户议价更弱**的银行,市场化后风险承担反应更强。 - **按机制选维度**:切银行类型(国有大行 vs 城商/农商)。预期城商/农商系数更大。 - **看结果对话预期**:城商/农商组系数约为国有大行组的 1.8 倍,**组间系数差异检验**在 5% 显著(不是各自显著就完事)→ 与机制一致,反哺主结论。 - **反例("切西瓜"堆砌)**:再去切"东中西、男性高管占比、是否四大审计、注册地是否省会"等十余个与风险承担渠道无关的维度找显著 → 本刊审稿人会判为"数据探鱼",要求删掉无机制对话的切分。 ## "切西瓜"自查:维

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. 触发时机
  2. 原则:异质性要由机制预测,而非数据探鱼
  3. 金融相关的切分维度(对照表)
  4. 写法要点
  5. 自检清单
  6. 微型走查:把"利率市场化 × 银行风险承担"切对维度
  7. "切西瓜"自查:维度是否值得切
  8. 审稿人追问模式与本刊语境下的修法
  9. 校准锚点
  10. 反模式
  11. 输出格式
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jfr-heterogeneity skill do?

Use when the heterogeneity analysis of a 《金融研究》 (Journal of Financial Research) manuscript is too coarse or atheoretical — to cut along finance-relevant dimensions (ownership, bank type, market segment, financing constraint, region) that the mechanism predicts, not arbitrary splits.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfr-heterogeneity --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going