Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

jfi-rebuttal

Use when planning an R&R response letter for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) — single-blind review where referees know you, often a small number of expert reports, a narrow appeal path, and pushback centered on the intermediation channel. It structures the response; it does not fabricate results.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfi-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Financial-Intermediation-Skills/skills/jfi-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal Strategy (jfi-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an R&R or a reject-with-encouragement and must reply to referees and the Managing Editor - War-gaming likely objections before submitting (pre-mortem) ## JFI-specific posture (verified 2026-06-20; re-confirm on the official page) - Review is **single-anonymized (single-blind)** — referees know who you are, so tone matters and gratuitous self-defense reads poorly. - A paper may rest on a **minimum of one expert reviewer**, so a single decisive report can shape the outcome; treat each point as potentially pivotal. - A formal appeal may be possible under Elsevier's appeal policy, but only one appeal per submission is considered and the appeal decision is final. The response letter is still your main instrument; make it count rather than relying on later escalation. - The reviewer is a **banking / financial-intermediation specialist** — answer in the field's terms (identification of the intermediary mechanism, sample/bank-panel construction, robustness), not generic prose. ## Response-letter structure 1. **Cover note to the Managing Editor** — summarize the 2–4 substantive changes and how the paper is now stronger

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. JFI-specific posture (verified 2026-06-20; re-confirm on the official page)
  3. Response-letter structure
  4. Empirical vs. theory rebuttals
  5. Pushback patterns a JFI referee runs, and the credible fix
  6. A worked reply on the supply–demand point (illustrative)
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jfi-rebuttal skill do?

Use when planning an R&R response letter for the Journal of Financial Intermediation (JFI) — single-blind review where referees know you, often a small number of expert reports, a narrow appeal path, and pushback centered on the intermediation channel. It structures the response; it does not fabricate results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jfi-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going