Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

jel-topic-selection

Use when judging whether a literature is a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)-scale survey topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of synthesis — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the survey's animating question; it does not gather or synthesize the literature (that is jel-literature-synthesis).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-topic-selection --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-topic-selection/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Topic Selection for a JEL Survey (jel-topic-selection) ## When to trigger - You have a candidate field and need to know if it is "JEL-shaped" - A topic feels either too narrow (a single-question review) or too sprawling (a whole subfield) - You are deciding between JEL and a sibling outlet (JEP, Annual Review of Economics, a field journal's review section) - The literature is young/fast-moving and you suspect it is not yet mature enough to survey ## The four JEL-fit tests A literature belongs in JEL when it passes all four. If it fails one, route accordingly. 1. **Maturity.** There is a *body* of research — multiple research lines, accumulated evidence, recognizable debates — not a handful of recent working papers. A field that is still being born produces a *premature* survey that will date in a year. (Fails → too young; wait, or pitch JEP instead.) 2. **Importance.** The questions matter to economists broadly, not only to a dozen specialists. A JEL reader is a *non-specialist economist* who should finish the survey understanding why the field exists and what it has settled. (Fails → too niche; a field journal's review section fits better.) 3. **Need for synthesis.** The literat

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. The four JEL-fit tests
  3. Decision table
  4. Framing the animating question
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jel-topic-selection skill do?

Use when judging whether a literature is a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)-scale survey topic — mature, important, and genuinely in need of synthesis — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the survey's animating question; it does not gather or synthesize the literature (that is jel-literature-synthesis).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-topic-selection --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going