Agent skill · Testing & QA

jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance

Use when calibrating completeness vs. selectivity and ensuring fairness across schools, authors, and controversies in a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — including not over-promoting the author's own work. Audits coverage and even-handedness; it does not design the framework (jel-organizing-framework) or write prose (jel-writing-style).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Economic-Literature-Skills/skills/jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Comprehensiveness & Balance (jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance) ## When to trigger - The framework is set and you are filling cells with the literature - You are unsure whether to cite *everything* or curate - The field has rival schools, a live controversy, or conflicting empirical results - You are a contributor to this literature and worry the survey tilts toward your own work ## Completeness vs. selectivity: the JEL contract A JEL survey must be **comprehensive in coverage** yet **selective in emphasis**. The reader should trust that nothing important is missing, while the prose foregrounds what matters. Resolve the tension by **tiering** the corpus: | Tier | Treatment | |------|-----------| | **Foundational / field-defining** | discussed in the text, with what they established and their limits | | **Important contributions** | grouped and weighed within the framework's cells; cited with their finding | | **Confirmatory / incremental** | cited in clusters ("see also …") to demonstrate coverage without bloating prose | | **Tangential** | cited only where they bear on a specific claim; not every adjacent paper belongs | Comprehensiveness is proven by the *citation set* (the sat

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Completeness vs. selectivity: the JEL contract
  3. Fairness across schools, authors, and findings
  4. The self-citation trap
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance skill do?

Use when calibrating completeness vs. selectivity and ensuring fairness across schools, authors, and controversies in a Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) survey — including not over-promoting the author's own work. Audits coverage and even-handedness; it does not design the framework (jel-organizing-framework) or write prose (jel-writing-style).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jel-comprehensiveness-and-balance --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going