jeg-review-process
Use when navigating the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) editorial process — the Springer Nature submission path, editor screening for growth-and-development fit, theory and empirics referee expectations, desk-reject patterns, and decision-stage planning across review rounds.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeg-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jeg-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to know how JEG will read a manuscript before submission - A submitted paper is in review and you need to interpret likely concerns - You need to prepare for a revision after a decision letter ## Reviewer lens JEG is a specialist outlet for economic growth and dynamic macroeconomics. The review question is not "is this economics?" but "does this materially advance how we understand long-run growth, development, and dynamics?" Reviewers typically evaluate: - Fit with growth and dynamic macroeconomics - Theory originality, assumptions, and model tractability - Empirical identification and data credibility where relevant - Calibration discipline and sensitivity where relevant - Connection to core growth mechanisms and prior literature - Springer submission completeness and declarations ## Known process facts - Submission runs through the Springer Nature manuscript portal. - Editor-in-Chief listed in the source map: Oded Galor. - Peer-review model was not confirmed as single- or double-blind; do not assume. - No submission/handling fee; optional OA APC applies only if chosen. ## Pre-review risk table Before submission,
- When to trigger
- Reviewer lens
- Known process facts
- Pre-review risk table
- Desk-screen failure patterns
- Worked vignette — anticipating the referee split
- Process expectations (hedged)
- Output format
What does the jeg-review-process skill do?
Use when navigating the Journal of Economic Growth (JEG) editorial process — the Springer Nature submission path, editor screening for growth-and-development fit, theory and empirics referee expectations, desk-reject patterns, and decision-stage planning across review rounds.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jeg-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.