Agent skill · Documentation

jedpsych-rebuttal

Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. JEP R&Rs often demand added methodological rigor (multilevel modeling, cluster-level power, mechanism tests), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency, and the response must address every point while keeping the paper within format and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Educational-Psychology-Skills/skills/jedpsych-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal (jedpsych-rebuttal) A Journal of Educational Psychology **R&R** (usually a major revision) typically asks for **more methodological rigor** (model the nesting, power at the cluster level, test the mechanism), **fuller JARS disclosure**, or **stronger transparency** — and all of it must fit back inside the format and stay **masked**. The response letter must convert every reviewer and reassure the handling editor on rigor and educational relevance, while keeping the manuscript within the word budget. ## When to trigger - An R&R arrived and you are planning the revision + response letter - Reviewers requested multilevel reanalysis, added power, mechanism tests, disclosure, or open-science changes - A requested analysis would change the claim - Writing the cover note to the editor ## Strategy 1. **Read the editor's letter as the rubric.** Solve the decisive points first; the handling editor adjudicates among reviewers and synthesizes the required changes. 2. **Point-by-point, every comment.** Quote each comment, then respond; never skip one. 3. **Strengthen rigor, don't just defend.** Many requests (refit a multilevel model, re-power at the cluster level, add the mediat

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Strategy
  3. Response-letter format
  4. Worked micro-example (illustrative response entries)
  5. R&R triage — where each request lands
  6. Recurring R&R pushback and the venue fix
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jedpsych-rebuttal skill do?

Use when writing the response to a Journal of Educational Psychology revise-and-resubmit. JEP R&Rs often demand added methodological rigor (multilevel modeling, cluster-level power, mechanism tests), fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency, and the response must address every point while keeping the paper within format and masked. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jedpsych-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going