jcr-review-process
Use when understanding how Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) review and decisions work — double-anonymized review, the co-editor/AE/reviewer structure, decision letters, and what reviewers from different disciplines expect — before submitting or when a decision arrives. Sets expectations; the actual response is drafted in jcr-rebuttal.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcr-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jcr-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to know what to expect after submitting to JCR - A decision letter arrived and you need to read it before responding - You are unsure who handles the manuscript and what each reviewer weighs - You want to calibrate to JCR's developmental, multi-round culture ## How JCR review is organized JCR uses **double-anonymized** (masked) peer review: reviewers do not see author identity and authors do not see reviewers'. Editorially, the journal is led by an **Editor in Chief** (Oleg Urminsky, Chicago Booth, term Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2028) with **Co-Editors** who handle full manuscript portfolios, **Associate Editors**, an **Editorial Review Board**, and ad hoc reviewers. As of 2026-06-22 the Co-Editors are **Jacob Goldenberg, Ellie Kyung, Meg Meloy, Daiane Scaraboto, and Stephen Spiller** (Kyung and Scaraboto joined June 2026; Giana Eckhardt stepped down). The roster is time-sensitive — re-verify the current masthead at consumerresearcher.com before relying on specific names. The precise desk-assignment/routing mechanism is **待核实** (the official pages do not describe a fixed departmental area-editor routing); in practice a
- When to trigger
- How JCR review is organized
- What reviewers weigh
- Reading the decision letter
- Expectations & norms
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jcr-review-process skill do?
Use when understanding how Journal of Consumer Research (JCR) review and decisions work — double-anonymized review, the co-editor/AE/reviewer structure, decision letters, and what reviewers from different disciplines expect — before submitting or when a decision arrives. Sets expectations; the actual response is drafted in jcr-rebuttal.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcr-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.