Agent skill · Content & Marketing

jcp-literature-positioning

Use when staking a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript's contribution against the consumer-psychology literature and its siblings (JCR, JMR, Marketing Science, Psychological Science). Positions the mechanism as new; it does not build the theory (jcp-theory-development) or design studies (jcp-methods).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Consumer-Psychology-Skills/skills/jcp-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (jcp-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - A reviewer wrote "we already know this" or "how is this different from [classic effect]?" - Your contribution overlaps a well-known consumer-psych phenomenon and the delta is unclear - The paper could be read as JCR / JMR / Psychological Science and you must claim the JCP lane - Your literature review is a citation list, not an argument about what is missing - You are unsure whether to position against an *effect* or against a *process* in prior work ## Position the process against the field, not the effect At JCP the contribution is a mechanism, so positioning means showing **what the field believes about the process and how you change it** — not just that your effect is novel. The strongest JCP positioning identifies a **gap in causal understanding**: prior work documented the effect but mis-specified or never identified the process; or a dominant account predicts the wrong moderation; or two literatures make conflicting process claims your paper reconciles. Frame the review as a debt the field owes the consumer's mind, then pay it. A useful test: write the sentence "Prior work shows that X affects consume

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Position the process against the field, not the effect
  3. Staking the JCP lane against siblings
  4. Building the positioning argument
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jcp-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when staking a Journal of Consumer Psychology (JCP) manuscript's contribution against the consumer-psychology literature and its siblings (JCR, JMR, Marketing Science, Psychological Science). Positions the mechanism as new; it does not build the theory (jcp-theory-development) or design studies (jcp-methods).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcp-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going