Agent skill · Business & Finance

jcf-rebuttal

Use when preparing a revise-and-resubmit response for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) — a point-by-point reply to two-or-more single-anonymized reviewers and the handling editor, reconciling divergent demands without over-claiming. It structures the response letter and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcf-rebuttal --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Corporate-Finance-Skills/skills/jcf-rebuttal/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# R&R Rebuttal (jcf-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received an R&R from JCF and must write the response letter - Two or more reviewers asked for **different or conflicting** things - You need to map each comment to a concrete revision ## How JCF R&R works JCF review is **single anonymized** with a **minimum of two reviewers**, so you typically face **two independent sets of demands** plus the editor's priorities. Reviewers see your identity; the editor decides whether the revision clears the bar. Address every point, but prioritize the editor's framing. ## Response-letter structure 1. **Cover note to the editor**: thank them, summarize the **main changes**, and state how the revision resolves the core concern. Flag any request you respectfully decline and why. 2. **Per-reviewer sections**: restate each comment **verbatim**, then your response, then the **exact change** (section/table/page). 3. **Reconcile conflicts**: when reviewers disagree, state the trade-off, choose a defensible path, and show both robustness results where feasible. ## Revision discipline - [ ] Every comment has a numbered, traceable response - [ ] New analyses are added as **robustness**, not a redesign th

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How JCF R&R works
  3. Response-letter structure
  4. Revision discipline
  5. Reviewer-conflict table
  6. Comment-type playbook for JCF reviews
  7. Worked reply: the staggered-DID demand
  8. Routing new material in the revision
  9. Anti-patterns
  10. Output
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jcf-rebuttal skill do?

Use when preparing a revise-and-resubmit response for the Journal of Corporate Finance (JCF) — a point-by-point reply to two-or-more single-anonymized reviewers and the handling editor, reconciling divergent demands without over-claiming. It structures the response letter and revision plan; it does not run new analysis on its own.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jcf-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going