jbes-review-process
Use when planning around the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES) peer-review process — the multi-Co-Editor model, what method referees scrutinize, and the discussion-paper tradition. Sets expectations; it does not draft the response letter (see jbes-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jbes-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jbes-review-process) ## When to trigger - You want to understand how JBES handles a submission before you send it - You are deciding how to frame the cover letter for a multi-Co-Editor journal - You wonder whether your paper could be an invited discussion paper - You need to anticipate what method referees will attack ## How JBES review is structured JBES is run by a **rotating panel of Joint Editors with no single Editor-in-Chief**. The confirmed 2022-2024 term was held by **Atsushi Inoue** and **Ivan Canay**; current Joint Editors are **Yingying Fan**, **Michael Kolesár**, and **Dacheng Xiu** per the official T&F search snippet. Practical consequence: unlike a single-Editor-in-Chief journal, **field fit and cover-letter targeting** matter, because a handling Joint Editor whose expertise matches your method is more likely to evaluate and route it well. Submission platform, review-anonymity model, and timelines are live-page checks; do not assert them from this pack alone. ## What method referees scrutinize Because JBES is a **methods-with-empirics** journal owned by the ASA, referees are method experts who interrogate, in order: (1) **statistical validity** — are
- When to trigger
- How JBES review is structured
- What method referees scrutinize
- The discussion-paper tradition
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Review-risk pass for Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Output format
What does the jbes-review-process skill do?
Use when planning around the Journal of Business & Economic Statistics (JBES) peer-review process — the multi-Co-Editor model, what method referees scrutinize, and the discussion-paper tradition. Sets expectations; it does not draft the response letter (see jbes-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jbes-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.