Agent skill · Security

jar-literature-positioning

Use when positioning a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript within the accounting literature — stating the conversation you join, the marginal contribution over prior archival/disclosure/audit work, and why JAR (not TAR/JAE/RAST/CAR) is the home. Positions the paper; it does not build the mechanism (jar-theory-development) or articulate the discussion-section contribution (jar-contribution-framing).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jar-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: Journal-of-Accounting-Research-Skills/skills/jar-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (jar-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - The intro reads as gap-spotting ("no one has studied X") - A referee says "this is incremental over [prior JAR/JAE paper]" - You cannot name the specific accounting conversation you are joining - You are unsure whether JAR or a sister accounting journal is the right home ## Position against the accounting conversation, not a generic gap JAR referees are accounting economists who know the capital-markets, disclosure, audit, tax, and standard-setting literatures intimately. A strong front end names the **specific conversation** — e.g., the value-relevance/earnings-informativeness stream descending from Ball-Brown, the voluntary-disclosure literature, the cost-of-capital/information-environment literature, the audit-quality literature, the recognition-vs.-disclosure debate — and states precisely what is **open** in it. "Gap because unstudied" is not enough; the open question must matter economically. ## State the marginal contribution sharply - **Relative to the closest papers.** Identify the two or three nearest prior studies (often in JAR/JAE/TAR/RAST) and say what they got right and what they left unresolved

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. Position against the accounting conversation, not a generic gap
  3. State the marginal contribution sharply
  4. Get the venue right
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Before/after: the positioning paragraph
  8. Referee expectation checklist (accounting-economist reader)
  9. Output format
  10. Resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the jar-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when positioning a Journal of Accounting Research (JAR) manuscript within the accounting literature — stating the conversation you join, the marginal contribution over prior archival/disclosure/audit work, and why JAR (not TAR/JAE/RAST/CAR) is the home. Positions the paper; it does not build the mechanism (jar-theory-development) or articulate the discussion-section contribution (jar-contribution-framing).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jar-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going