jams-review-process
Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# Review Process (jams-review-process) ## When to trigger - Before submitting, to set realistic expectations about JAMS review - A decision letter arrived and you need to interpret it before responding - You are unsure who decides at JAMS and what reviewers are told to weigh - You want to know what conditional acceptance triggers (data/code deposit) ## How JAMS review works - **Double-anonymized.** Authors and reviewers are concealed from each other; keep every round anonymized, including revised files and any preregistration links. - **Developmental philosophy.** JAMS, like the AMS journals, runs a **developmental review** — area editors and reviewers aim to improve promising papers across rounds, not merely gatekeep. A well-run R&R is the realistic best case; first-round acceptance is essentially unheard of. - **Decision structure.** Manuscripts are handled by an **Area / Associate Editor** under the Co-Editors-in-Chief (Stephanie M. Noble and Charles H. Noble, University of Tennessee, since June 2024 — verified 2026-06-22; re-verify the masthead before submission). Your keyword/area choices in Editorial Manager influence routing, so choose them to reach the right editor and revi
- When to trigger
- How JAMS review works
- Likely decisions
- Reading the decision letter
- Calibrate expectations before you submit
- Where JAMS differs from the siblings' processes
- After the decision: the immediate moves
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jams-review-process skill do?
Use when understanding how Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) review and decisions work — the Springer Editorial Manager flow, the double-anonymized developmental review, the area-editor structure, the dual theory-and-managerial evaluation bar, and how to read a decision letter. Explains the process and reads the letter; it does not draft the response (jams-rebuttal).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-review-process --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.