jams-rebuttal
Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jams-review-process).
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# R&R Revision & Response (jams-rebuttal) ## When to trigger - You received a JAMS major/minor revision and need a plan and a response letter - A reviewer challenged the **theoretical contribution**, **managerial relevance**, construct validity, or identification - You must revise *before* writing the response (do not draft the letter on an unrevised paper) - A subsequent round arrived and you need to show movement since the last revision ## Sequence: revise first, then respond JAMS R&Rs are **developmental and often multi-round**. Revise the manuscript first; the response letter documents changes that already exist. Lead the work with the **editor's decisive concerns**, which at JAMS almost always include the two gates: a genuine **theoretical contribution** and a clear **managerial contribution**. A revision that polishes peripheral points but leaves a gate unaddressed will not advance — and area editors track whether each round actually moves on the issues they flagged. ## Build the response letter - **Open** with a brief summary of the most important changes and how the paper is now stronger on both the theory and managerial bars. - **Point-by-point:** restate each comment, the
- When to trigger
- Sequence: revise first, then respond
- Build the response letter
- Address JAMS-specific concerns head-on
- Prepare transparency deliverables
- Triage the comments before you start revising
- Show movement across rounds
- Handle conflicting reviewers
- Checklist
- Anti-patterns
- Output format
What does the jams-rebuttal skill do?
Use when planning a revision and drafting the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) R&R — prioritizing the editor's decisive concerns, strengthening both the theoretical and managerial contribution, and preserving double-anonymized rules. Plans and drafts the response; it does not interpret the original decision (jams-review-process).
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill jams-rebuttal --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.