isca-camera-ready
Use when converting an accepted ISCA paper into its published form — de-anonymizing authors, acknowledgments, and artifact links; satisfying the edition's publisher workflow under the alternating ACM/IEEE arrangement; integrating shepherd requirements and badges; and preparing the June talk and attendance logistics.
Profile →npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill isca-camera-ready --agent claude-code
Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.
Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.
# ISCA Camera-Ready Acceptance starts a second, administrative project with real failure modes: papers have appeared with anonymization stubs intact, dead artifact links, and acknowledgments naming the wrong grant. The 2026 edition maintained a dedicated camera-ready guidelines page (`iscaconf.org/isca2026/submit/cameraready.php` — its detailed contents were not directly fetchable at verification
What does the isca-camera-ready skill do?
Use when converting an accepted ISCA paper into its published form — de-anonymizing authors, acknowledgments, and artifact links; satisfying the edition's publisher workflow under the alternating ACM/IEEE arrangement; integrating shepherd requirements and badges; and preparing the June talk and attendance logistics.
How do I install it?
Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill isca-camera-ready --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.
Where does this skill come from?
From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.
Is a popular skill a good skill?
Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.