Agent skill · Data & Analytics

io-transparency-and-data-policy

Use when preparing the replication/transparency materials for an International Organization (IO) manuscript. IO's signature requirement is verification BEFORE final acceptance — the editorial staff request data and code at conditional acceptance, IO staff re-run quantitative results and check proofs of formal models, and editors withhold final acceptance until all reported results are confirmed; materials then deposit to the IO Dataverse with a DOI and a Data Availability Statement. Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill io-transparency-and-data-policy --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 5 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: International-Organization-Skills/skills/io-transparency-and-data-policy/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Transparency & Data Policy (io-transparency-and-data-policy) IO does not just ask for data — its **editorial staff re-run your quantitative results and verify the proofs of your formal models, and editors will not issue final acceptance until all reported analyses are confirmed.** This pre-publication verification is IO's signature. Build the package as you analyze so conditional acceptance does not stall. ## When to trigger - Building the reproducibility/replication package (start during analysis, not at acceptance) - A manuscript reached **conditional acceptance** and the editorial staff requested data and code - You have a **formal model** whose proofs IO staff will verify - Data cannot be fully shared (privacy, ethics, legal/provider restrictions) and you need the path - Writing the **Data Availability Statement** ## What IO requires (verify current wording on the policy page — 待核实 on verbatim text) 1. **No data at initial submission.** Authors **do not** provide data or command files when first submitting (consistent with double-blind review). 2. **Data requested at conditional acceptance.** The editorial staff **request the data and command files at the time of conditional

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. When data cannot be shared (exemption path)
  3. Build-as-you-go checklist
  4. Anti-patterns
  5. Output format
  6. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the io-transparency-and-data-policy skill do?

Use when preparing the replication/transparency materials for an International Organization (IO) manuscript. IO's signature requirement is verification BEFORE final acceptance — the editorial staff request data and code at conditional acceptance, IO staff re-run quantitative results and check proofs of formal models, and editors withhold final acceptance until all reported results are confirmed; materials then deposit to the IO Dataverse with a DOI and a Data Availability Statement. Prepares the package; it does not waive requirements.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill io-transparency-and-data-policy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going