Agent skill · Data & Analytics

io-data-analysis

Use when executing and reporting the empirical analysis (or the formal-model results) for an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it survives expert double-blind IR review and IO's pre-publication verification. The IO editorial staff re-run quantitative analyses and check formal proofs before final acceptance, and IR data raise distinctive estimation problems (dyadic dependence, selection into treaties/alliances/conflict, gravity structure). Guides analysis and reporting; it does not fabricate results.

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill io-data-analysis --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: International-Organization-Skills/skills/io-data-analysis/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Data Analysis (io-data-analysis) Two facts shape how you analyze for IO. First, IO publishes **international-relations** work, so the estimation problems are IR-specific — dyads are not independent, states select into treaties and wars, trade follows a gravity structure, and many "variables" are estimated constructs. Second, IO's editorial staff later **re-run your quantitative analyses and verify your formal proofs before final acceptance** (see `io-transparency-and-data-policy`). This skill covers execution and reporting; identification choices live in `io-research-design`. ## When to trigger - Estimating the main international effect and supporting analyses; writing the results section - A referee asked for robustness, heterogeneity by issue area, or an alternative estimator - Deriving and presenting the results/comparative statics of a formal model - Separating preregistered from exploratory analyses on a foreign-policy experiment ## IR-specific estimation concerns - **Dyadic and network dependence.** Directed/undirected dyads share members, so observations are not independent. Use two-way or multiway clustering, dyadic-robust SEs, or latent-space/AME network models rather th

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. IR-specific estimation concerns
  3. Reporting standards IO referees expect
  4. Formal-model results
  5. Verification-readiness (engineer it during analysis)
  6. Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)
  7. Anti-patterns
  8. Output format
  9. Supplementary resources
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the io-data-analysis skill do?

Use when executing and reporting the empirical analysis (or the formal-model results) for an International Organization (IO) manuscript so it survives expert double-blind IR review and IO's pre-publication verification. The IO editorial staff re-run quantitative analyses and check formal proofs before final acceptance, and IR data raise distinctive estimation problems (dyadic dependence, selection into treaties/alliances/conflict, gravity structure). Guides analysis and reporting; it does not fabricate results.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill io-data-analysis --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going