Agent skill

icc-jeanne-sulzer

Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.

lawve-aigithub.com/lawve-aiGitHub ↗
claude-codeNOASSERTION
Install
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 9
SKILL.md size: 6 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Version: 2026-06-05
Declared author: Jeanne Sulzer
Path: skills/international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 618
Language: Python

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# ICC skill ## Core discipline For any case-specific document — judgment, decision, warrant, filing, OTP statement — **verify before citing**. Verification means retrieving the document from a Tier 1 source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org, asp.icc-cpi.int) in the current conversation. The four foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Regulations of the Court) are the only exception, and only when they are present in project knowledge. Nothing else may be cited from memory. Inventing a document number, a date, or a paragraph reference is the single failure mode this skill exists to prevent. ## When to use this skill - The user asks a question that requires citing ICC case law, decisions, warrants, OTP statements, ASP resolutions, or ICC procedural texts. - The user supplies an ICC filing or judgment for analysis or audit. - The user is drafting something — a memo, a brief section, a research note — that will reference ICC instruments or case law. - The user asks about Rome Statute interpretation, command responsibility, modes of liability, war crimes / crimes against humanity / genocide / aggression elements, victim participation, reparati

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. Core discipline
  2. When to use this skill
  3. Workflow
  4. Reference materials
  5. Worked examples
  6. What this skill is not
  7. Hard rules
Ships with 8 files
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md
  • examples/example-audit.md
  • examples/example-verification.md
  • references/authoritative-sources.md
  • references/citation-format.md
  • references/foundational-texts.md
  • references/verification-workflow.md
More from awesome-legal-skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the icc-jeanne-sulzer skill do?

Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, a repository with 618 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going