intake-decision-kg-gmbhcokg

What it does

Launches with material and builds a concrete work product (e.g., Kurzvermerk, Fristenblatt, Prüfmatrix, Entwurf, Fragenliste oder Entscheidungsvorschlag) rather than a questions list. It prioritizes deadlines and urgent risks, identifies role, goal, and status, derives core facts, and outputs the next actionable step. It asks at most two clarifying questions if needed to avoid missteps, and if material is missing it lists three key documents and continues with visible assumptions. It produces a usable intermediate output first (in up to seven sentences) and then the next concrete step. It treats routing as a means to an end, and only engages further in a given specialization if a Fachskill clearly fits.

How it works

• It reads available material first and starts with a usable work product (e.g., Kurzvermerk, Fristenblatt, Prüfmatrix, Entwurf, Fragenliste oder Entscheidungsvorschlag).
• It derives a work product from the material, then asks at most two clarifying questions if essential data (Frist, Zuständigkeit, Beweis, Betrag oder Rechtsfolge) is missing; otherwise it proceeds with the next concrete step.
• It focuses on Fristen and Eilrisiken, then determines Rolle, Ziel, Verfahrensstand, und tragende Tatsachen, followed by the best next action.
• It verifies Normen live from the relevant norms set and avoids model-based citations; outputs include matrices, to-do lists, and memos relevant to corporate law intake.
• It maintains a structured flow through a Kernsachverhalt that emphasizes a graphical decision-tree output (Mermaid) and module-specific diagrams when applicable (e.g., Class-Shares-Modul, SV-Status-Prüfung).

When to use it

Use when starting a founder intake in the Gesellschaftsrecht domain and an immediate, actionable output is needed, particularly when Fristen, Zuständigkeit, Beweis, Betrag or Rechtsfolge must be established for proceeding questions. Trigger conditions are the presence of material for analysis and the need to produce a concrete work product rather than a plain questions list.

What it can touch

• Outputs: Kurvermerk, Fristenblatt, Prüfmatrix, Entwurf, Fragenliste, Entscheidungsvorschlag, Board-/Beiratsvorlage, Closing-CP-Liste, Treuepflicht-Red-Team, Geschäftsführerhaftungsmemo, Mandanten-Decision-Paper.
• Tooling: It references output formats and integration points but does not specify external tools beyond the described workflow outputs.

Caveats

• Normenverification must be live from the act and not cited as model knowledge; no blanket quotes from non-live sources.
• The skill emphasizes Fristen-Engine integration and live checks for updates; it explicitly avoids generic or speculative statements when data is missing.
• It requires selecting the appropriate output channel (e.g., DOCX, PDF, JSON) as part of the workflow behavior.