Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

imfer-referee-strategy

Use when anticipating the objections a dual academic/policy IMF Economic Review (IMFER) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter (imfer-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imfer-referee-strategy --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-referee-strategy/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Referee Strategy (imfer-referee-strategy) ## When to trigger - The paper is near submission and you want to stress-test it against the referees it will draw - You must decide which robustness/identification checks to run *before* submitting vs. hold in reserve - An R&R arrived and you must map referee concerns to concrete responses - You want to understand how IMFER's double-blind, dual-audience review shapes strategy ## How IMFER review works (plan around it) IMFER uses **double-blind review** through Editorial Manager (anonymize the main file and self-citations) (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). The distinctive feature is the **referee pool**: typically one frontier international-macro researcher *and* readers attuned to **policy relevance and IMF-program realism**. The modal report attacks (1) the **credibility of the cross-country / policy-surprise design**, then (2) **country composition and external validity**, then (3) **whether the policy implication is actually warranted**. A clean estimate with an over-reached or under-developed policy claim is a common rejection. Plan to **pre-empt the predictable objections in the paper** and reserve the letter for genuinely new asks. | Referee ob

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How IMFER review works (plan around it)
  3. Triaging which checks to run before vs. after
  4. Strategy craft
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  8. Referee pushback mapped to the pre-emption
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the imfer-referee-strategy skill do?

Use when anticipating the objections a dual academic/policy IMF Economic Review (IMFER) referee will raise, so a manuscript pre-empts them before submission or addresses them in revision. Plans the defense; it does not draft the response letter (imfer-rebuttal) or run the submission preflight (imfer-submission).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imfer-referee-strategy --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going