Agent skill · Code Review & Quality

imfer-literature-positioning

Use when the contribution of an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript relative to the international-macro frontier and the sibling journals is unclear or undersold. Stakes the claim against JIE/JIMF/JMCB and the IMF research stream; it does not select the topic (imfer-topic-selection) or design identification (imfer-identification).

brycew6m878★ · +32/wk · 1 repos on radarProfile →
claude-codeMIT
Install
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imfer-literature-positioning --agent claude-code

Same command for any agent — swap --agent for codex, cursor, copilot.

Facts
Files in the skill folder: 1
SKILL.md size: 7 KB
Bundled scripts: none
Path: IMF-Economic-Review-Skills/skills/imfer-literature-positioning/SKILL.md
Open the folder on GitHub →
Where it comes from
Stars: 909 · +31 this week
Language: Stata
Read our review of the source →

Weekly change comes from our own snapshots, not the repository page — it measures attention, not adoption.

From the SKILL.md

# Literature Positioning (imfer-literature-positioning) ## When to trigger - A referee or coauthor says "I am not sure what is new here relative to [JIE / JIMF paper]" - The paper cites broadly but never states the **one-sentence delta** over the closest prior work - You cannot tell whether the contribution is empirical (new fact), methodological, or policy-design - The framing reads like a JIE or JIMF paper and you must pull it toward IMFER's policy-relevant frontier - You need to place the paper in the **IMF research stream** (WEO/GFSR themes, ARC topics, prior IMFER issues) without name-dropping - A reviewer suspects the result restates a known global-financial-cycle / sudden-stop finding under a new label ## How IMFER weighs a contribution IMFER referees ask three things at once: *Is the finding new at the frontier? Is the identification credible? Does it change how a policymaker should think about an international-macro problem?* A paper that is new but policy-mute, or policy-relevant but already known, stalls. Position the contribution on the axis where it is strongest, and be explicit about the **closest two or three papers** — including the sibling-journal ones — so the ref

What's inside
Steps it walks through
  1. When to trigger
  2. How IMFER weighs a contribution
  3. The sibling map (know exactly where you sit)
  4. Positioning craft
  5. Checklist
  6. Anti-patterns
  7. Worked vignette (illustrative)
  8. Referee pushback mapped to the positioning fix
  9. Output format
More from Awesome-Journal-Skills
All skills →
About this skill
What does the imfer-literature-positioning skill do?

Use when the contribution of an IMF Economic Review (IMFER) manuscript relative to the international-macro frontier and the sibling journals is unclear or undersold. Stakes the claim against JIE/JIMF/JMCB and the IMF research stream; it does not select the topic (imfer-topic-selection) or design identification (imfer-identification).

How do I install it?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill imfer-literature-positioning --agent claude-code` — it drops the skill into your project so the agent can pick it up. Swap the --agent value for codex, cursor or copilot if you use one of those.

Where does this skill come from?

From brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills, a repository with 909 stars. We read it straight from the repository tree rather than a submitted listing, so what you see here is what is actually published.

Is a popular skill a good skill?

Not necessarily. Stars measure attention, not adoption — a repository can trend for a week and be abandoned. That is why we show the weekly change from our own snapshots next to the total, instead of a single flattering number.

Keep going